Monday, June 5, 2017

The greatest contradiction in human – environment interactions




Today 5th June is WORLD ENVIRONMENT DAY. The World celebrates nature. The theme for World Environment Day 2017 "Connecting People to Nature", implores us all to get outdoors and into nature, to appreciate its beauty and its importance, and to take forward the call to protect the Earth that we share. Land is the foundation of environment.

Land encompasses surface, space, soil, provision of food and water, and a basis for urban and industrial development. Land stands for property and is a production factor besides labor and capital. Land embodies many more dimensions, such as homeland, place of ancestry, a prerequisite for realizing individual freedom, and a basis for survival or wealth.

In traditional ancient societies, land was considered a gift from God that allows satisfying primary needs for food and shelter and, therefore, it is not transferable nor has it value. As put poetically by Polanyi (1944:187): “Land is tied up with the organization of kinship, neighbourhood, craft, and creed – with tribe and temple, village, guild, and church. … It invests a man’s life with stability; it is the site of his habitation; …; it is the landscape and the seasons”.

With the entrenchment of market economy or capitalism societies are changing, and a growing number of people are gradually losing the link with their ancestral land as a common asset. Instead of viewing land as a sacred trust, a gift of God to all humans, the idea of ownership and private property as a sacred right was introduced. The sanctification of property rights is an essential feature of markets. The market economy separates the man from the land, and turn both into commodities freely available for sale and purchase.

Bringing land into the ambit of the marketplace was a slow process, which followed centuries of violent dispossession initially in Europe, then Americas, Australia and New Zealand. First agricultural capitalism created the need for enclosures of vast tracts of land. Spearheaded by philosophers like John Locke (1689)’s The Second Treatise of Government, new theories of property were developed to facilitate accomplishment of this transformation. Theories of property have become a bedrock of contemporary economic thought and arguments favouring private property over the public need for commons.

Since as early as 13th Century in Europe, years of violent dispossession of commons were and continue to create poor people as described by Karl Polanyi (1944: 37): “The lords and nobles were upsetting the social order, breaking down ancient laws and custom, … by violence… They were literally robbing the poor of their share in the commons, tearing down the houses … [of] the poor. The fabric of society was being disrupted; desolate villages and the ruins of human dwelling testified to the fierceness with which the revolution raged, endangering the defences of the country, wasting its towns, decimating its population, turning its overburdened soil into dust, harassing its people and turning them from decent husbandmen into a mob of beggars and thieves”.

According to Thomas Malthus, the poor were responsible for their lot because of overbreeding, leading to an imbalance between the population and the food. Unless this overbreeding was checked, it would lead to the spread of vice and misery, which is the natural result of poverty. Thomas Malthus (1798: 61)’s An Essay on the Principle of Population argues that feeding the poor would aggravate the problem of poverty by creating even more poor. With appropriate laws of the time, the dispossessed poor are driven into a pool of surplus labour required for mass capitalist production. A clearer expression of the necessity of poverty for providing labour is given by Burke (1877, cited by Winch, 1985: 240), who wrote: “When we affect to pity as poor those who must labour or the world cannot exist, we are trifling with the condition of mankind.” Ricardo (2010: 45) wrote that “The principle of gravitation is not more certain than the tendency of (laws providing relief for the poor) to change wealth and vigour into misery and weakness ... until at last all classes should be infected with the plague of universal poverty.”

As argued by Karl Polanyi in his 1944 monumental classic The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Times. The commodification of human beings and land required by the dominance of the market has done tremendous damage to society and environment. The value of human life has been degraded to their earning power. The world was peaceful until people started selling land, labour (turning human lives into saleable commodities in order to create a labor market) and money – three commodities very crucial to the efficient functioning of a market economy.

Dispossessed of their ancestral lands, most poor people squatter on unsafe tiny public spaces called slums. Ideation and acceptance in human mindsets of certain ideologies related to land, labour and money, justified and continue to justify both poverty and a certain amount of insensitivity, numbness and indifference to poverty. This is a greatest contradiction human nature that we continue to live with.

No comments:

Post a Comment